ZeroWater vs PUR: Which Pitcher Filter Is Better in 2026?

ZeroWater 5-Stage Replacement Filter (4-Pack)

VS

PUR Water Pitcher Replacement Filter (4-Pack)

At a Glance

ZeroWater and PUR take fundamentally different approaches: ZeroWater goes all-in on TDS removal with a 5-stage ion exchange system, while PUR offers targeted contaminant reduction with a practical filter life. This comparison comes down to whether you prioritize maximum purity or affordable, convenient filtration.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Filtration Depth

ZeroWater's 5-stage ion exchange system achieves something no other pitcher filter can: 0 TDS water. It is IAPMO certified for lead, chromium, PFOA, and PFOS reduction, plus it removes 99.6% of all total dissolved solids including fluoride. PUR's 2-in-1 activated carbon and ion exchange removes 20+ specific substances and is NSF 42/53 certified for lead, mercury, and chlorine. ZeroWater filters more thoroughly, but PUR targets the contaminants that matter most to most households.

Filter Life & Practicality

PUR filters last 40 gallons — about 2 months for average use. ZeroWater filters last only 15-25 gallons, and in high-TDS areas can deplete in as little as 2 weeks. This means a PUR 4-pack covers 8 months of use, while a ZeroWater 4-pack may cover only 2-4 months. The constant replacement cycle with ZeroWater is its biggest practical limitation — you need to keep a stockpile on hand to avoid gaps in filtered water. In practice, most households won't notice PUR filter changes at all since they happen roughly every two months, while ZeroWater users quickly learn to watch the included TDS meter and keep spare filters in the pantry.

Cost Per Gallon

PUR's 4-pack yields 160 gallons total at one of the cheapest per-gallon costs in the pitcher category. ZeroWater's 4-pack yields only 60-100 gallons — roughly 4-7x the per-gallon expense. The cost gap is enormous: over a year of filtering 3 gallons daily, PUR costs a fraction of what ZeroWater demands. For budget-conscious households, PUR delivers strong filtration at dramatically lower running costs.

PFAS & Specialized Contaminant Removal

ZeroWater has a verified edge here. Its IAPMO certification covers PFOA and PFOS — the "forever chemicals" that are an increasing public health concern. PUR does not certify for PFAS removal. If you live in an area with known PFAS contamination (near military bases, industrial sites, or airports that used AFFF firefighting foam), ZeroWater's certified PFAS reduction provides meaningful protection that PUR cannot match.

Taste & User Experience

Most users report that PUR-filtered water tastes clean and natural, with beneficial minerals left intact. ZeroWater's 0-TDS output strips all minerals, producing water that many describe as flat or empty-tasting. PUR also includes the LockFit design for secure filter seating. ZeroWater includes a TDS meter — a useful tool for measuring water quality and knowing when to replace filters. Both approaches have merit, but most taste testers prefer water with some mineral content. If you regularly brew coffee or tea, PUR's mineral-retaining filtration tends to produce a fuller-bodied flavor, while ZeroWater's stripped output can make hot beverages taste noticeably thin.

Who Should Get Which?

Frequently Asked Questions